Lawrence: Bill Barr Refuses To Say Trump & Giuliani Wouldn’T Sell Pardons

Unleash Your Creative Genius with MuseMind: Your AI-Powered Content Creation Copilot. Try now! 🚀

In a recent lawsuit filed in Manhattan, former New York City mayor, Rudy Giuliani, is facing serious accusations including sexual assault, wage withholding, federal income tax evasion, and even selling condos for two billion dollars. While these allegations may sound grotesque, they only scratch the surface of the most graphic parts of the complaint. Despite the gravity of these allegations, Giuliani has chosen to remain silent for over 48 hours since the accusations became public. His only response has been a written statement denying the allegations. It's worth noting that the limited coverage of this lawsuit is due to the fact that very few passages from the complaint can be read on television.

One of the most scandalous accusations in the complaint involves Giuliani allegedly selling pardons for $2 million during Donald Trump's presidency. This accusation is particularly damning because it appears on the same page of the complaint where there is a screenshot of a text message from Giuliani to his employee, Noelle Dunphy, asking if he can "shower with her." This shocking revelation adds another layer of scandal to an already explosive situation.

Section 2: Doubts and Speculations

As news of these allegations spread, people naturally began questioning the possibility of Giuliani selling pardons. Even Donald Trump's former Attorney General, William Barr, admitted to being skeptical about these claims. When asked if he thought Giuliani would engage in such behavior, Barr's response was far from a strong defense. He simply stated, "I don't know. I hope he wouldn't."

This lackluster response from Barr, who knows both Giuliani and Trump well, raises even more concerns. Any other Attorney General would likely vehemently deny such accusations, but Barr's response leaves room for doubt. When pressed further about the possibility of Giuliani selling pardons and splitting the money with Trump, Barr's best answer was again, "I don't know."

This uncertainty is unsettling, as it suggests that even those closest to Giuliani and Trump cannot provide a clear defense against these accusations. It leaves room for speculation and raises questions about the integrity of those involved.

Section 3: the Fallout and the "Document" Controversy

The controversy surrounding Giuliani and Trump doesn't stop at these shocking allegations. Recent developments regarding a cache of documents seized by the FBI from Trump's residence in Florida have only added fuel to the fire. In a stunning interview on CNN, Trump claimed that he took the documents and that he was allowed to do so under the Presidential Records Act. This statement directly contradicted a letter written by one of Trump's lawyers defending him in Jack Smith's special investigation, in which he claimed the documents ended up in Florida by accident.

In response to Trump's claim, the lawyer resigned. This turn of events raises serious questions about the veracity of Trump's statements and the credibility of his defense. If the lawyer's letter disagrees with Trump's assertion that he took the documents, it suggests that the defense strategy is falling apart. CNN also reported on a letter from the National Archives to Trump, informing him that 16 records involving close presidential advisers, including some personally directed to Trump, will be handed over to Jack Smith, the special prosecutor.

The potential fallout from these developments puts Trump in an even more precarious position, as it contradicts his claims of being able to automatically declassify the documents. It also suggests that Trump might face further trouble if Jack Smith obtains these records from the National Archives.

Section 4: The Manhattan Case and Additional Crimes

In addition to the allegations involving pardons and the document controversy, Trump is also a criminal defendant in Manhattan. The District Attorney recently clarified the other crimes he believes Trump intended to commit along with the falsification of business records and the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels. The District Attorney's court filing states that these additional crimes may include violations of the Election Law and New York tax laws, among others.

This revelation adds a new layer to the ongoing legal battles involving Trump. It suggests that the implications of his actions go beyond a single incident and could involve a more extensive web of criminal activity. As the legal proceedings unfold, the true extent of Trump's involvement in these crimes will become clearer.

Conclusion

The allegations against Rudy Giuliani and the ongoing controversies surrounding Trump continue to captivate the public's attention. From the shocking accusations in the lawsuit to the uncertainties surrounding the sale of pardons, the story is far from over. As more information comes to light and legal proceedings progress, the public awaits answers to the many questions raised by these events. The outcome of these cases will have far-reaching implications, not only for the individuals involved but also for the state of our democracy.

Watch full video here ↪
Lawrence: Bill Barr refuses to say Trump & Giuliani wouldn’t sell pardons
Related Recaps