Jordan Peterson Just Exposed The Whole Damn Thing!

Introduction

The concept of achieving Net Zero on the carbon front by 2030 is not only a lie, but a preposterous notion that cannot be comprehended. The Biden Administration itself has admitted that it will take optimistic projections of 240 years before any approximation of Net Zero can be achieved. This deceptive claim and its implications need to be fully understood, as they have severe consequences for both the economy and the environment.

Unreliable Power at a High Cost

One of the major fallouts of pursuing these misguided net zero goals is the emergence of unreliable and expensive power sources. Countries like Germany, which have embarked on a path towards supposed net zero, are experiencing the detrimental effects firsthand. As renewable projects fail to provide consistent power, these countries are forced to rely heavily on coal as a backup, leading to a significant rise in energy costs. In fact, the world consumed more coal last year than ever before in history, largely due to countries like Germany shutting down their nuclear plants and depending heavily on coal.

Environmental Impact: The Devastation of Reliable Power

Another alarming consequence of the net zero movement is its failure to improve the environment. Countries like Germany, in their pursuit of renewable energy, have devastated their reliable sources of power without making any significant positive impact on the environment. On the contrary, the world's reliance on coal has increased, undermining any claims of progress. It is crucial to recognize that in many developing nations, coal remains a better alternative to other sources of energy such as wood or dung. The options for these nations are not coal or nothing, but coal or less efficient and more polluting sources of energy. This further highlights the flawed nature of the net zero agenda.

The Illusion of Poverty Alleviation

One important aspect that is often overlooked in the net zero debate is its potential impact on poverty. Energy production, particularly in the form of coal, has played a significant role in lifting millions out of poverty worldwide. By restricting the use of coal and other conventional energy sources, net zero proponents are indirectly contributing to a rise in poverty levels. This, coupled with the increased costs of energy, poses a threat to the stability and prosperity that we often take for granted in industrialized societies. It is crucial to consider the long-term effects of net zero initiatives on the livelihoods of millions of people.

The Role of American Energy

American energy, through its various sectors, has been instrumental in promoting human flourishing on a global scale. The ability to produce and utilize coal, natural gas, and oil has been a driving force behind economic development and technological advancements. Removing these sources of energy, as some net zero proponents suggest, would have dire consequences on human flourishing and the availability of modern technologies. We need to remember that our everyday lives are intertwined with petrochemical products, from alarm clocks to toothbrushes, highlighting the indispensable role of conventional energy sources.

Hidden Agendas: BlackRock and State Street

The push for net zero by certain corporations like BlackRock and State Street reveals deeper motives that the general public may not be fully aware of. While these companies advocate for net zero in America, they are investing and leveraging their funds to do business in China, the largest polluter in the world. China has a significantly higher number of coal-fired power plants compared to America. This discrepancy raises questions about the true intentions behind the net zero rhetoric. It is essential to be cautious of hidden agendas that prioritize retail opportunities over genuine environmental concerns.

Conclusion

The concept of achieving net zero by 2030 is not only a lie, but a dangerous proposition that overlooks the adverse effects on the economy, environment, and global poverty levels. The pursuit of net zero has led to the rise of unreliable energy sources, increased energy costs, devastated reliable power sources, and worsened the environment. It is crucial to critically analyze the implications of such initiatives and question the true intentions behind corporate advocacy for net zero. By addressing these concerns, we can ensure a more balanced and sustainable approach to addressing climate change without compromising human flourishing and stability.