The Truth About What The Durham Report Actually Reveals About The Deep State, With Dan Bongino

Unleash Your Creative Genius with MuseMind: Your AI-Powered Content Creation Copilot. Try now! 🚀

It's a true travesty. The Durham report, which holds immense significance, is being almost universally ignored. As a newswoman who openly admits to being more right-leaning, this is genuinely infuriating to me. I can cover Trump fairly, acknowledging his flaws, but the disregard for this report is absolutely disgusting.

Let's talk about the word "coup." Yes, Trump used that word, but he didn't say "violent coup." He simply stated "coup," which, by definition, refers to an unauthorized, illegal, and illicit overthrow of a governing body. And guess what? It actually applies here. It tautologically applies. The lefties may have disregarded it, but as a journalist, I can see the relevance. And I believe it matters to you too.

Now, let's consider this from a different perspective. Imagine you're a young secret service agent on the Obama detail. You've been away from home for weeks, sacrificing time with your family. You've even had to hide your suitcase in the garage to shield your daughter from seeing the cab and suitcase leaving. And you've done all of this for a Democrat president, one who you believe despises the constitutional republic as it stands.

But here's the thing—despite your personal beliefs, you do your job. You do it well. Because it matters. You swore an oath, and you take it seriously. And let's not forget, the secret service agents are not just protection agents; they are also federal investigators. They don't let political affiliations cloud their judgment when it comes to arresting someone. That's integrity.

And that's precisely what the most damning part of the Durham report highlights. Margot Cleveland, in her article for The Federalist, pointed out that Durham doesn't call for new rules. He calls for the FBI to act with integrity. Let that sink in for a moment. The most powerful federal law enforcement body, with the authority to take away your life, freedom, and property, is being questioned by a special prosecutor. And what does he say? They have an integrity problem.

Now, if integrity is an issue, it means there's a personnel problem. And how do you solve that? By getting rid of the problematic individuals and replacing them with others who possess integrity. It's that simple. You can't fix a problem like this by creating new rules. It requires a personnel change.

Let me share a story to illustrate why rules don't always matter. When I first joined the Secret Service, we were taught that protesters had to stay in designated protest zones. But thankfully, some smart citizens challenged this notion. They questioned why they couldn't walk beyond the protest zone just because they had a paper sign. And you know what? They were right.

The judge ruled in favor of the citizens, stating that America is a protest zone. And to their credit, the Secret Service acknowledged their mistake. They sent out an email, eliminating the concept of protest zones altogether. They recognized their lack of integrity in teaching such a ridiculous rule, and they fixed it.

So, if the Secret Service can admit their mistakes and rectify them, why couldn't the FBI do the same? Why did they think it was reasonable to spy on the president without any substantial evidence? Did they really need a rule stating that they can't spy on the president without a legitimate reason? It's absurd.

We need to clean out the FBI. That's what needs to happen. President Trump, during his appearance on the show, expressed his intention to do just that. And I have no reason to disbelieve him. I was still at Fox when Comey was fired, and I admit, I had faith in him initially. But boy, was I wrong. Mueller, Comey, Brennan—they all had their roles to play in dragging this country through three years of hell.

But here's the thing about history—liberals may write the history books, but even they eventually have to admit their mistakes. They had to acknowledge that David Dinkins was an awful mayor, with thousands of deaths occurring annually during the crack wars. Giuliani, despite his eccentricities, was a better option. And the same will happen with Mueller, Comey, and Brennan. History won't be kind to them.

I make mistakes, and I admit them. I'm not your moral guide, but I love this country. And when I see something as significant as the Durham report being ignored, it's my duty to speak up. We need to demand integrity from our law enforcement agencies, and we need to hold them accountable. It's time to clean house and restore faith in the system.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the disregard for the Durham report is a true travesty. The word "coup" is applicable, and it's infuriating to witness the lack of attention given to such a crucial matter. The FBI's integrity problem needs to be addressed, and the solution lies in replacing those lacking integrity. Rules don't always matter; what matters is doing what's right. It's time to clean out the FBI and restore faith in our law enforcement agencies. History won't be kind to those who dragged this country through hell. It's time for change.

Watch full video here ↪
The Truth About What the Durham Report Actually Reveals About the Deep State, with Dan Bongino
Related Recaps