Jorge Macri: "El Gobierno Terminó Por Destruir La Ejemplaridad"

In the province, an interesting debate is unfolding, and it all begins with the simple act of finding common ground. Jorge Eliotti had mentioned this before, and it's an essential point to consider. We must start by recognizing the agreements we can find. It's crucial to understand that, while we can later debate which agreement is better or more valuable, the initial step is coming together. This mechanism of dialogue is crucial for navigating the challenging task ahead – rebuilding hope, providing certainty, and reinstating the idea that effort leads to reward.

As Federico aptly pointed out, our challenge is to reconstruct and provide hope. We must restore people's faith in the value of their efforts. In addition to the turmoil that Federico mentioned, the most significant damage this government has caused is a devastating destruction of example and trust in leadership. This is reminiscent of a father at home; if a parent says, "Why bother?," their children will mirror that indifference. These politicians have created a dramatic scenario, a spectacle that leaves people bewildered. We've entered a realm of societal destruction that goes beyond mere political disputes.

The consequences are far-reaching, affecting our social contract and respect for one another. We've reached a point where individuals start to release their grip on reality. They feel as if nothing makes sense anymore. The breakdown of the social contract has led to a decline in respect for others. It's a state of chaos where individuals leave their vehicles and engage in senseless confrontations. We've descended into a new level of madness.

But there's a glimmer of hope, a tiny spark in the midst of this turmoil. Take a moment to watch the recent encounter between two elderly individuals, both retirees. Initially, they were irate, but as they began to converse, their shared grievances and frustrations led to a different outcome, one I discussed with Federico earlier. This is the truth of our society.

It's fascinating because it highlights a graphic representation of the current state of our society. Some forces are trying to drive a wedge into society, creating a false divide. There's a rational and legitimate aspect to the rift, which is open to discussion, but there's another part that's completely irrational and illegitimate. The encounter between these two retirees, who share the same anxieties and frustrations, demonstrates what's happening.

As you can see, when the elderly man confronts the situation, the woman takes a seat.

This is where our focus should be.

What's happening now is a vivid illustration of the efforts to sow division in society. There's a false divide, created by the Kirchnerism and these activist groups. They are nurturing hatred. It's precisely what's happening, and it's essential to recognize it. The kirchnerism and these activist groups are driving a wedge between the people.

The Divide – Rational and Irrational

In this divide, there are two distinct aspects to consider. The rational part, one that allows for discussion and debate, is legitimate. People can have varying opinions, and that's natural. However, there's another side of this divide that is entirely irrational and illegitimate.

The incident with the two retirees, who share the same struggles and frustrations, vividly illustrates this point. They engaged in a dispute because someone in the crowd was attempting to indoctrinate them. The intention is to fuel this divide, and it's exactly what's happening. The Kirchnerism and these activist groups are fanning the flames of hatred. This division is false and manufactured.

A Message for the Opposition

The people have a request for the opposition, and it's not a plea born out of love but rather a demand for action. Political leaders are no longer held in high regard, as they once were. The people are tired of infighting within the opposition.

If the opposition wishes to represent a beacon of hope, they must cease their internal conflicts. If they don't, they risk pushing voters to either abstain from voting or cast their ballots elsewhere.

Unity in Diversity

One of the issues at hand is the variation between the province and the city of Buenos Aires. Some might question the need for two presidential candidates. However, the rationale behind this decision is sound.

The province of Buenos Aires is vast, and the president cannot be everywhere all the time. Each presidential candidate needs their spokesperson. These spokespeople, in the form of provincial governors, are essential. They go to towns and regions where the presidential candidate cannot reach, providing essential representation.

The city of Buenos Aires, with its many media outlets, makes it easier to manage a single candidate. While some may doubt the system or fear discrepancies, it is, in fact, a good one. We have witnessed consistent polling, and I have full confidence in the numbers we've seen so far. I don't expect any significant changes in the coming two weeks.

The city of Buenos Aires is a district under constant scrutiny. Surveys are conducted regularly, and I anticipate no surprises. The polls have shown me in a favorable position. I want to take this moment to offer reassurance to the thousands of people who support me. You can rest assured that no judicial trap will prevent me from becoming a candidate.

When I was interviewed earlier, I was asked what would happen if a radical party member challenged my candidacy. I replied with confidence that I had all the necessary documents and was secure in my eligibility. This is also a message to those who have faith in me. I know that there are hundreds of thousands of people who want to vote for me. No one will stop me from pursuing change, from challenging entrenched political systems that have failed to serve the people. I will be a candidate, and I fulfill all the requirements with an excess of certainty.

Leading the Way

Drawing from my experience as a former mayor, I must emphasize the importance of leadership within the police force. To steer a police force effectively, one must lead with firmness and be consistently present. You cannot manage a security force from a distance; it requires hands-on involvement.

The recent situation involving Commissioner Leguizamón, as discussed by Florencia Arieto, is a point of concern. While it's essential to address the issue of police conduct, it's equally important to recognize the need for strong leadership within the police force.

In conclusion, let's continue to focus on building bridges and finding common ground in our society. While there is a divide, it's vital to distinguish between the rational and irrational aspects of this rift. The people are looking to the opposition for unity, and we must respect the diversity that makes up our nation. Leaders must be present and assertive in their roles to guide our security forces effectively. In this time of change and challenge, we must hold onto our hope and work toward a better future.