Rand Paul On Rising: Moderna Privately Admitted The Truth About Myocarditis And Vaccines

Yesterday, modernist CEO Stefan Bonsell found himself in the hot seat as he appeared before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. One specific topic that garnered significant attention was the potential link between the coveted vaccine and cases of myocarditis. One senator, in particular, didn't hold back in pressing Bonsell on this issue.

During the hearing, the senator confronted Bonsell with a bold statement. "You're saying that for ages 16 to 24, among males who take the coveted vaccine, their risk of myocarditis is less than people who get the disease. That is my understanding. That is not true," the senator asserted. To support their argument, the senator revealed a stack of six peer-reviewed papers from reputable journals such as the Journal of Vaccine and The Annals of Medicine.

These papers contradicted Bonsell's claim and painted a different picture altogether. The senator also mentioned a recent private conversation they had with Bonsell's own president. According to the senator, the president acknowledged in private that there is indeed an increased risk of myocarditis associated with the coveted vaccine. The fact that this information is not being publicly disclosed is deeply concerning.

Senator Rand Paul, who conducted the grilling, joined the discussion to shed more light on his conversation with Moderna's president. Paul revealed that their conversation was cordial and centered around the issue of vaccinating children and those at higher risk. Paul expressed his skepticism about the vaccine's risk-benefit ratio, stating that he wouldn't personally vaccinate his children for covet. He believed that the risks posed by the vaccine were greater than the risks of the disease itself.

Paul then posed an interesting question: if someone's position fell between vaccinating three times and not vaccinating at all, why not consider just one dose? He argued that there was no evidence to support the requirement of three vaccines, which seemed to go against the scientific evidence available. Paul expressed concerns about the lack of warning and discussion from public health doctors regarding the potential risks of vaccinating children who had recently recovered from covet.

Furthermore, in the discussion, Paul highlighted the discrepancy between the incidence of myocarditis in individuals who had recovered from covid compared to those who had received the vaccine. While the CDC initially reported that the incidence of myocarditis was higher in individuals recovering from covid, a closer examination revealed that the risk was significantly higher in vaccinated 16 to 24-year-old males. This discrepancy points to the need for a more nuanced understanding of individuals' age and risk factors when assessing vaccine safety.

Paul also emphasized the importance of considering the immune response of individuals who have recently recovered from covid before vaccinating them. Administering a vaccine during the recovery period could potentially amplify the immune response, leading to adverse effects such as myocarditis. In light of these concerns, Paul believed that there had been insufficient warning and discussion by public health doctors regarding the vaccination of children who had recently recovered from covet.

The conversation then took a turn towards the controversy surrounding the origins of the virus. Dr. Anthony Fauci, in a documentary released this week, addressed Senator Paul's previous questions on whether the virus could have originated from a lab funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Fauci dismissed this possibility, likening it to trying to turn a car into a motorcycle.

In response, Senator Paul argued that Fauci was presenting a straw man argument. Paul clarified that he was not claiming that any published work from the Wuhan lab became covid-19. Instead, he contended that the lab had manipulated over a hundred coronaviruses in their research, many of which remained unpublished. Paul also highlighted a grant proposal submitted by the lab in 2018, requesting funds to create a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site, a feature that makes the virus more transmissible to humans. While the proposal was rejected by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the coincidence of covid-19 having a furin cleavage site raised questions.

Throughout the interview, Paul expressed his frustration with the lack of transparency and accountability in the public health sector. He emphasized the need to investigate all grants and information related to the origins of the virus, calling out the potential conflict of interest faced by Fauci. Paul believed there was a cover-up beginning in January 2020 and accused Fauci of trying to hide the truth.

In closing, Paul addressed the Senate's recent vote against his amendment to repeal the 2001 measure authorizing the use of military force in the global war against terror. While disappointed with the outcome, he remained hopeful that the debate and subsequent repeal of certain resolutions would bring an end to the forever wars and reevaluate the involvement of the military in numerous countries.

The questioning of Bonsell and the subsequent discussion with Senator Paul shed light on the controversies and concerns surrounding the coveted vaccine, myocarditis, and the origins of the virus. These discussions highlight the importance of transparency, scientific integrity, and a comprehensive understanding of the risks and benefits when making decisions related to public health.

As the debate over vaccination policies and the search for truth continues, it is crucial to encourage open dialogue, rigorous scientific investigation, and accountability in the public health sector. Only through these measures can we ensure the health and well-being of our society.