Tin Thế Giới Hôm Nay 18/3 | Lệnh Bắt Giữ Tt Putin Ảnh Hưởng Thế Nào Đến Cuộc Chiến Ở Ukraine? | Fbnc

The recent arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Russian President Vladimir Putin on charges of war crimes during the war in Ukraine has sparked significant debate and speculation about its potential impact on Putin and the ongoing conflict. However, legal experts have pointed out that it is highly unlikely that Putin will actually appear in court unless he is directly arrested, which is improbable given his position as the leader of Russia. Furthermore, the ICC does not have its own police force, so cooperation with the host country's police would be necessary for any arrest to take place. Consequently, in the short term, the arrest warrant is likely to have little practical impact as Putin likely anticipated such a move and the ICC warrant is regarded as a symbolic step rather than a significant legal action.

Dr. Eboe-Osuji, the president of the ICC, has emphasized that the arrest warrant is crucial because it signifies that no one is above international law. He believes that the warrant will ultimately lead to Putin's impeachment. However, military analyst Sean Bell suggests that the arrest warrant might actually hinder any plans Russia has to end the war, as Putin may become less inclined to negotiate if he is forced to face trial. Dominic Waghorn, Sky News' international affairs editor, shares this view, noting that the warrant threatens to hamper peace talks.

The impact of the arrest warrant on Putin's isolation and perception as a leader largely depends on the response from the United Nations (UN). Although the ICC is a separate entity from the UN, the two organizations have a close relationship, and the UN possesses the power to bring a case to court. Legal commentator Rozenberg acknowledges that while the accusation of illegally deporting Ukrainians to Russia is a relatively minor crime compared to the war crimes Putin is accused of, the ICC's decision to publicize the allegations sends a clear message that they want to hold Putin accountable.

The Limitations of the ICC and its Effect on Holding Leaders Accountable

The ICC, established in 2002 and operating under the Rome Statute, is the world's first permanent international criminal court, boasting 123 member countries. However, major world powers such as China, India, and the United States have neither ratified the Rome Statute nor recognized the jurisdiction of the ICC. Although US President Joe Biden has deemed the arrest warrant for Putin a legitimate move and a strong message, the US itself does not accept the authority of the ICC.

Russia has rejected the ICC's decision, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov asserting that Russia does not recognize the ICC, and its rulings are legally invalid. China, which is scheduled to have a summit with Putin, has remained silent on the arrest warrant and President Biden's response.

Overall, while the arrest warrant for Putin possesses symbolic significance, its practical impact on the conflict in Ukraine and Putin's leadership is anticipated to be limited. The ICC's lack of enforcement capability and the refusal of major powers to recognize its jurisdiction undermine its effectiveness in holding influential leaders accountable for war crimes.

China's Relationship with Russia and the Concerns of the United States

In a visit to Russia, Chinese President Xi Jinping has caused concern among US officials, who fear that any proposal made by China could benefit Russia and harm Ukraine. The unrestricted relationship between Moscow and Beijing has raised alarms within the White House. Although the ICC's recent arrest warrant for Putin is seen as a cautionary signal for world leaders in their dealings with Russia, China, which does not recognize the International Criminal Court, has abstained from voting sessions at the United Nations related to Russia's military campaign in Ukraine.

Despite China's abstention, its strengthening ties with Russia have still sparked worry, as it has the potential to prolong the war in Ukraine and challenge Western support. While there is currently no indication that China will provide lethal weapons support to Moscow, US officials predict that the upcoming meeting between Xi and Putin in Russia may yield announcements connected to this issue.

The situation has made Xi's visit to Moscow more complex, particularly in light of the ICC's arrest warrant for Putin. China does not approve of any country or court having the right to interfere in its affairs and did not sign the Rome Statute in 2002.

Developments in Ukraine and Other International News

On the Ukrainian battlefield, Denis Pushilin, the head of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic, reported that Russian forces have prevented Ukrainian troops from withdrawing their troops from Bakhmut. Russian forces are gradually entering the city, and Pushilin believes that the liberation of Bakhmut is a promising endeavor.

Russian forces have also captured several significant settlements in the direction of Avdiivka, one of the major strongholds of the Ukrainian army. Additionally, a Ukrainian official reported that the Russian army is preparing defensive fortresses in southern Ukraine, specifically along the roads in the Kherson region leading to Crimea, indicating a potential military operation.

The situation in Crimea has escalated, with the Russian military announcing the interception of a "large-scale" drone attack on the area. Meanwhile, the UN is engaged in negotiations to extend the cereal deal between Russia and Ukraine, which has been vital for Ukraine's exports of corn and wheat.

Moving on to other international news, China has criticized the bans imposed by the governments of New Zealand and the United Kingdom on the short video-sharing application TikTok, denouncing it as an abuse of the concept of national security. China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin has urged New Zealand and the UK to stop over-expanding and abusing the concept of national security, in order to provide a fair and non-discriminatory environment for companies from any country. However, the two countries have yet to respond to his statement.

Both New Zealand and the UK recently implemented bans on TikTok on government devices due to concerns about information security related to ByteDance's TikTok application, which is based in China. These concerns have been growing in recent weeks, and the Biden administration has also pressed ByteDance to divest from its US company to avoid further US bans on TikTok. Previously, the US announced that state agencies had until the end of March to remove the TikTok application from all government devices.

In conclusion, this news update covers a range of significant topics, including the impact of the ICC arrest warrant on Putin and the Ukraine conflict, the limitations of the ICC in holding leaders accountable for war crimes, China's relationship with Russia and the concerns of the United States, developments in Ukraine, and other international news.