'No Doubt' Money Went To Joe Biden: Rudy Giuliani | Rob Schmitt Tonight

In the midst of the anticipation surrounding a potential indictment of Donald Trump, it is essential to take a closer look at the hyper-partisan investigators involved in the case. Manhattan's District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, has come under scrutiny for his connections to George Soros and his controversial policies that many argue have contributed to the decline of law and order in New York and the rest of the country.

Bragg, who received a million dollars from Soros's Color of Change PAC during his campaign in 2021, has fully embraced a belief system that paints criminals as the real victims, showing a clear disdain for the rest of society. This perspective was evident in the case of Jose Alba, a bodega worker who found himself charged with murder after defending himself against a violent attacker. It was only after immense public pressure that the charges against Alba were dropped. Bragg has also been known to downgrade felony charges to misdemeanors when it comes to drug dealers and violent offenders, a decision that has sparked controversy and concern for public safety.

However, when it comes to President Trump, the charges seem to be going in the opposite direction. This raises the question of whether the investigation into Trump is politically motivated, rather than driven by a genuine pursuit of justice. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has voiced his concerns about the potential indictment, suggesting that it is evidence of a corruption within the justice system under the Biden administration. Giuliani argues that politically motivated prosecutions are a sign of a deteriorating civilization and the erosion of democratic principles.

Giuliani also highlights the contrasting treatment of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, who seem to be walking free despite allegations of federal crimes and their involvement with China. The evidence, including wire transfers and personal admissions, points towards corruption and potential treasonous acts. Yet, Bragg's focus appears to be on pursuing Trump for campaign finance violations, which many legal experts argue might not even be considered a crime in certain circumstances.

Giuliani's comparison of these cases emphasizes the notion that personal motivations, such as protecting one's reputation and family, often play a role in financial transactions, including non-disclosure agreements. The prevalence of such agreements in Manhattan alone underscores the reality that they are a common practice, rather than evidence of criminal activity. Giuliani suggests that Bragg's lack of familiarity with the true nature of legal practices indicates that he is more of an ideologue than a warrior for justice.

Revenge or Justice?

The motivations behind the indictment of Trump are called into question when considering the comments made by Michael Cohen, a key figure in the investigation. Cohen, who has a clear agenda against Trump, asserts that no one is above the law and the indictment is a matter of justice and retribution. Yet, critics argue that individuals like Cohen have a long history of deceit and should not be trusted as credible witnesses. They point out that the credibility of those involved in the investigation may have been compromised due to personal biases and vendettas against Trump.

Rudy Giuliani criticizes Cohen and others like him, branding them as con men who have a reputation for bending the truth. He suggests that their involvement in the investigation undermines its legitimacy. Giuliani's skepticism raises doubts about the integrity of the process and whether it is truly objective and impartial.

The Verdict

As we await the outcome of the investigation and the potential indictment of Donald Trump, it is crucial to consider the larger implications of partisan investigations. The case against Trump raises questions about the impartiality and integrity of the justice system, particularly in politically charged situations. It becomes essential to separate personal agendas from the pursuit of justice and ensure that investigations are driven by facts and evidence rather than bias and vendettas.

The hyper-partisan nature of investigations, as exemplified by Alvin Bragg and his connections to George Soros, serves as a reminder that justice should be blind and not swayed by political motivations. In order to maintain a fair and just society, it is of utmost importance to uphold the principles of law and order without succumbing to the whims of personal beliefs and vendettas. The outcome of the Trump indictment will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for our democracy and the ideals upon which it is built.